Copyright infringement

US commits to no anti-satellite tests that fill orbit with debris –

The United States has announced that it will no longer conduct anti-satellite missile tests, a practice that has angered the global aerospace community for filling hazardous waste. Vice President Harris announced the new policy today, hoping to set an example – although it has not been so long since we were doing this.

The Pledge of Allegiance to Satellite is the first in a series of new “external customs” being considered by the National Security Council, the Pentagon, the State Department and other security concerns. orbital operations.

Being able to carry it on an orbit satellite is one of the capabilities that the military around the world likes to display, generally fig leaves showing that it can remotely remove a defective part of their equipment. Of course the primary purpose is to show that they can beat anyone others Birds in the sky should be considered necessary.

China launched the ASAT operation in 2007; The United States made one in 2008; India took its role in 2019, and Russia most recently in late 2021.

While everyone claims to know more about how cloud clouds and other factors will play out, the simple fact is that each of these missions explodes hundreds or thousands of objects into uncontrollable space. With thousands of satellites deployed each year now these unforeseen catastrophic events are not an academic threat.

During a visit to Vandenberg Air Force Base, Harris said the United States would no longer conduct “direct anti-satellite (ASAT) missile testing,” which leaves things open to laser and other methods. but we will cross that bridge. when we arrive. The United States “seeks to establish this as a new international tradition of responsible behavior in the air.”

It is deceptive, for people to agree on what can be done in space and the like, as it legally speaks in the wild west of even more deals and treaties in space.

Robin Dickey, an air policy analyst at the Center for Higher Air Policy and Strategy “There is no one size fits all solution for how to develop”. “The approach you take is likely to be very different depending on the content and context.”

Sometimes this means working with partner agencies to find the best practices to share; sometimes goes through the UN to ensure it is an international dialogue; Sometimes (at this time, for example) a unilateral decision is made in the hope that it will produce a new standard. Although 2008 and the last ASAT test were not long ago, the space community has changed dramatically since then and what was not recommended at that time is now neglected. (Fools may point out that, when they have shown ability, there is no reason for us to do so again, making this promise a bit less).

“Setting these standard expectations for what is acceptable and unacceptable in space is an important step to ensure that space is safe and usable for the next several decades,” Dickey said.

Of course in the context of Russia and China cutting off their airspace programs in the United States, Europe and beyond, there is an additional purpose to this – doing so many actions similar to the last test is not just smart- bad but it is a step beyond international expectations. .