Copyright infringement

California takes on Big Plastic over recycling myths

California will investigate whether oil companies have broken the law by continuing the myth about plastic recycling, Attorney General Rob Bonta announced yesterday.

The investigation marks the beginning of a new effort to hold the fossil fuel industry accountable to reduce the damage their products do to the planet. California will see if the companies have it Consumers have been misled into thinking that recycling protects their waste bins and the environmental system – and if they have broken any rules in the process.

The fact is that most plastics – more than 90 percent all plastics ever made – not recycled.

“Enough is enough,” Bonta said a press release. “For more than half a century, the plastics industry has been engaged in an aggressive campaign to deceive the public, continuing the myth that recycling can solve the plastic problem.”

Plastic is actually harder to recycle (than some other products) and shrinks every time it is cleaned. That is one reason why it is not possible for a plastic bottle to be another bottle. If reused, it is more likely to rise like carpet wires, which does not require high-grade plastic. And it often costs more to recycle plastic than to throw it away, burn it – or do more. new plastic.

Plastic makers expected these problems with their products decades ago, according to a 2020 study. NPR and PBS Front row, but recycling has been stepped up to be a solution to the plastic waste anyway. “There is a great deal of doubt about that [recycling plastic] It can always be done financially, ”the newspaper quoted an industry expert in a 1974 speech as saying.

The popularity of plastic has skyrocketed in the last few years. The world today produces 200 times more plastic than it did in the 1950s. The California investigation will investigate. “The role of companies in perpetuating the myths about recycling and the extent to which this fraud continuesand determines that their actions violate the law.

The government has issued the first court order for ExxonMobil, one of the world’s largest plastics manufacturers. on the email Qarka, ExxonMobil Media Manager Julie King called Bonta’s remarks a “useless claim” that “derails the important collaborative work of improving waste management and improving circulation.”

Despite decades of failure to recycle plastics, many companies are still trying to sell products that they say are too durable because they use recycled plastic or “recyclable”.

Take the “Mouse Plastic Ocean” that Microsoft released last year, indoors cooperation with Saudi Aramco (an oil company) under the Saudi Basic Industries Corporation. About 20 percent of the rat’s shell was recycled into plastic. But any benefits from using a lot of recycled material can be eliminated if the company sells 20 percent more products. In addition, the hot market for recycled plastics may actually keep the market afloat with new plastics because low quality recycled plastics are often reinforced with virgin plastic. Recycling alone cannot make our plastic addiction sustainable.

If companies like ExxonMobil would know this (e.g. Exxon knew Earlier that fossil fuel would trigger a climate crisis) and it decided to use that misleading information however to attract consumers, California could eventually hold them accountable. similar lawsuits they are still going through the court.